I've been reading Jess A. Goldberg's new book, Abolition Time: Grammars of Law, Poetics of Justice for a an academic book club. The book proposes a lot of interesting ways of close reading through the lens of abolition in literary texts. I might gather my thoughts more completely once I've finished the book, but for now, I was particularly struck about the way that Goldberg writes about the difficulty of imagining abolition: To think justice in excess of the law is not posited as a task with a definite answer, where ethics is a crude list of good and bad imperatives. Rather, to think justice in excess of the law is the messy project of abolition. In the words of contemporary abolitionist Mariame Kaba, “we’ll figure it out by working to get there. You don’t have to know all the answers in order to be able to press for a vision.” (Goldberg 22-3) The task, again in the words of Mariame Kaba, the abolitionist writer and activist whose work first helped shape my thinking down t...